I think finobe.net will implode tommorow.

yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah yeah

I think finobe.net will implode tommorow.

yes

I was actually thinking to make a post about this a few days prior, but either I could not been asked or felt delusioned enough to expect only disagreement about this.

I was strongly confident about it bringing back ORC to a good condition. Aesthetiful has great knowledge when it comes to web security, and that was the major reasoning behind it all. But that was before the incident which has happened a few days ago. Now then, as well as with Todd stating in the "Critical problem" forum post that anything can go wrong when the clients will be ready, all I can say is: I do not know.

If we really want finobe.net to resurrect the ORC, everything MUST be polished for it to happen. I do mean that it MUST be, otherwise this revival and the trust which we gave to Aesthetiful would be on the line, and I am pretty sure he does not want that to happen. Importances like security and vulnerability patching MUST be the prime focus of it, if we all hope for it to happen. Every flaw, and literally every must be eliminated.

Now, I do know I sound like a perfectionist here, but in the reality of revivals, this is a valid point with how many low-effort revivals have fallen apart because of them not focusing of the main principle of web development and the important mindset of revivals that "You cannot trust the client". We do not want that to happen to finobe.net, right?

In short: finobe.net must give it all, in order to do it flawlessly.

I was actually thinking to make a post about this a few days prior, but either I could not been asked or felt delusioned enough to expect only disagreement about this. I was strongly confident about it bringing back ORC to a good condition. Aesthetiful has great knowledge when it comes to web security, and that was the major reasoning behind it all. But that was before the incident which has happened a few days ago. Now then, as well as with Todd stating in the "Critical problem" forum post that anything can go wrong when the clients will be ready, all I can say is: **I do not know.** If we really want finobe.net to resurrect the ORC, everything **MUST** be polished for it to happen. I do mean that it **MUST** be, otherwise this revival and the trust which we gave to Aesthetiful would be on the line, and I am pretty sure he does not want that to happen. Importances like security and vulnerability patching **MUST** be the prime focus of it, if we all hope for it to happen. Every flaw, and literally **every** must be eliminated. Now, I do know I sound like a perfectionist here, but in the reality of revivals, this is a valid point with how many low-effort revivals have fallen apart because of them not focusing of the main principle of web development and the important mindset of revivals that "You cannot trust the client". *We do not want that to happen to finobe.net, right?* In short: *finobe.net must give it all, in order to do it flawlessly.*

2016 is easy to patch since the client source code was leaked

2016 is easy to patch since the client source code was leaked

That is indeed true and something that I am aware of myself, but:

1. The 2012 client is still a hellscape of Assembly code that I do not bother to understand (I plausibly could, but I have better and more important things to do than involving in grey area)
2. Again, with the concerns that I have after the said incident, I really do want to be sure that not just the backend, but everything in this revival has at the very least little to no flaws at all, else the potential would be lost to the brim.

It already feels like that I am starting to get paranoid, but I just value this revival with the way how it acts 10x more adequate than any other and I do not really want someone oppositional of that (like what could have happened) to kill it just like that.

will it survive

will it survive

it survived 2 years without client it could survive much longer

>But that was before the incident which has happened a few days ago.

Can somebody explain to me what exactly happened, what incident exactly? Is this related to dive spamming the forums or?

>But that was before the incident which has happened a few days ago. Can somebody explain to me what exactly happened, what incident exactly? Is this related to dive spamming the forums or?

related to dive friending everyone without friend request and also spamming the forums