Original Post - 02/07/2026 02:30 PM *(edited)

MaskotGame

Posts: 54

Clearly Finobe.net is not progressing anywhere regarding client work. I have been bugging watrabi about clients in the Finobe.net Discord for the past 27 days and no progress, in fact, he is thinking of making another revival instead of working on this one.

He is clearly not interested, but datastore does not see that. If you were in charge of hiring people for client development on Finobe.net, who would it be?

I would personally pick meditext, he is a good friend and i know he would deliver good clients since i played one of his revival, AFTERWORLD that actually had clients in it and not just endless procrastination and neglect like in the case of watrabi and Finobe.net

1
1
0
Reply - 02/14/2026 04:11 AM

Sea

Posts: 131

banned from both

It depends on what you said or done, but I do agree that revivals like to do concerning actions in the background. It can be all revivals at this point, without this one being an exception.

I really hope that ORC could eventually watch it's behavior. But since we are talking about users and owners who may be experiencing adolescence, I may be asking for a lot.

1
1
0
Reply - 02/14/2026 06:40 AM

Sea

Posts: 131

It is a perfect time to refresh people's minds about [aunt's post about using Kanvas or Kiseki instead.](finobe.net/forum/post?id=886) I am aware that both are not ready yet, but I wanted to bring it up because we seem to forget things happening with this revival. Like Nyx said, **the bar is so low now.** But I honestly think that it may not be neccesary to create a whole new client and go towards the Austiblox*-ish* route instead.

Okay, I actually looked around and apparently Kiseki's client, Aya, is already open sourced! If anyone's interested, it's located in a TBDPowered Git instance at aya.kiseki.lol!

I feel like now it is a perfect time for the finobe.net staff to do something now.

0
0
0
Reply - 02/14/2026 03:59 PM

MaskotGame

Posts: 54

It depends on what you said or done, but I do agree that revivals like to do concerning actions in the background. It can be all revivals at this point, without this one being an exception. *I really hope that ORC could eventually watch it's behavior. But since we are talking about users and owners who may be experiencing adolescence, I may be asking for a lot.*

> I may be asking for a lot.

You aren't. There is still people in the ORC who are good, don't underestimate the amount of genuine people who are in this community. Tbh tho, none of those "genuine" people were willing to do clients for Finobe.net, either because of lack of knowledge or distracted by other projects.

1
1
0
Reply - 02/15/2026 01:37 AM

Sea

Posts: 131

> I may be asking for a lot. You aren't. There is still people in the ORC who are good, don't underestimate the amount of genuine people who are in this community. Tbh tho, none of those "genuine" people were willing to do clients for Finobe.net, either because of lack of knowledge or distracted by other projects.

Here is the thing, I know you said "No mentioning yourself", but I hope you do me an exception:

Months ago, I was doing a bit of research on Client Development and it looks like there are resources like lrre.wiki and the unofficial Boomblox Wiki. It looks a bit too simple to play around with, as I have a fair level of knowledge with Programming (Well, I know Lua better. But after learning Lua, knowing other languages' syntax like C++ is way easier (Assembly feels like a headache a bit, but if I remember correctly, x64dbg has a C translator). However, I am concerned if patching clients can be as simple as following such guides.

I am sure you have connections with Client Developers, hence may I ask a question to meditext or whoever you may have: Can Client Patching be as simple as following these resources? This is why I said you do me an exception, because I feel like I am near the point of actually having the knowledge to patch clients. Well, atleast on a simple, but enough for a functioning revival. There may be more to it, but I would not mind to research further.

0
0
0